Making the Most of the Soft Toric Contact Lens Opportunity in Practice

By Jennifer Palombi, OD, FAAO

It is estimated that approximately 40% of the population has 0.75D or more of cylinder in at least one eye, yet data from the 2024 international contact lens prescribing report shows soft toric contact lenses represented 32% of all soft lens fits reported globally, as well as in the United States.1 What accounts for the discrepancy in toric lens prescribing versus the percentage of eyes requiring toric lens correction?  This is likely attributable to a persistent habit of attempting to “mask” low to moderate amounts of cylinder with spherical equivalent contact lens correction. 

The impact of leaving as little as 0.75D of cylinder uncorrected can result in a significant decrease in distance and near visual acuity and reading speed, with low levels of induced astigmatism also decreasing reading fluency and stereoacuity.2-4 Uncorrected astigmatism can also result in increased symptoms of ocular discomfort, dry eye and headaches.2,3 Contrary to historical thinking, spherical soft lenses with thick or high-modulus designs do not “mask” astigmatism,5-7 nor do aspheric optics improve visual outcomes for low astigmats compared to toric correction.8,9 

Uncorrected astigmatism not only results in reduced visual performance for the wearer but can ultimately lead to contact lens dropout. Sub-optimal vision performance is a significant cause of contact lens drop out by itself,10-12 with additional research finding a direct correlation between decreased vision and reduced overall comfort scores.13,14 All of these insights serve as a reminder to ensure the vision and comfort needs of patients with astigmatism are fully met in contact lenses. 

While the prevalence of astigmatism has not changed significantly during the last three decades,15 soft toric lens design and availability certainly has. Given the wide choice of materials, replacement schedules, prescription options, and toric lens designs available in the CooperVision® toric lens portfolio, the eye care professional can fit virtually any astigmatic patient with the many reliable options available to them from a world leader in soft toric lens design.*16,17

Read the full article here and discover how you can make the most of the soft toric contact lens opportunity in your practice. 

17608
More Blog Posts
Related posts

* Combination of 2022 market research based on global volume data and internal estimates.

References:

1.  Morgan PB et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2024. PentaVision. January 6, 2025. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2025/januaryfebruary/international-contact-lens-prescrbing-in-2024/.

2. Wolffsohn JS, Bhogal G, Shah S. Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. Mar 2011;37(3):454-60. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.09.022

3. Wills J, Gillett R, Eastwell E, et al. Effect of simulated astigmatic refractive error on reading performance in the young. Optom Vis Sci. Mar 2012;89(3):271-6. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182429c6b

4. Al-Qahtani H, Al-Debasi H. The effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near stereoacuity. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018/10/01/ 2018;32(4):275-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.09.001

5. Bernstein PR, Gundel RE, Rosen JS. Masking corneal toricity with hydrogels: Does it work? International Contact Lens Clinic. 1991;18(3):67-70. doi:10.1016/0892-8967(91)90072-8

6. Snyder C, Talley DK. Masking of astigmatism with selected spherical soft contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc. Oct 1989;60(10):728-31. 

7. Cho P, Woo GC. Vision of low astigmats through thick and thin lathe-cut soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2001;24(4):153-60. doi:10.1016/s1367-0484(01)80034-5

8. Kollbaum P, Bradley A. Aspheric contact lenses: Fact and fiction. COntact Lens Spectrum. November 30, 2023. Accessed January 17, 2025. https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2005/march/aspheric-contact-lenses-fact-and-fiction.

9. Morgan PB, Efron SE, Efron N, Hill EA. Inefficacy of aspheric soft contact lenses for the correction of low levels of astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci. Sep 2005;82(9):823-8. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000177792.62460.58

10. Young G. Why one million contact lens wearers dropped out. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. Jun 2004;27(2):83-5. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2004.02.006

11. Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C. Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. Feb 2017;40(1):15-24. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2016.10.002

12. Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C, McCready S, Targett MT, Craven R. Retention Rates in New Contact Lens Wearers. Eye Contact Lens. Sep 2018;44 Suppl 1:S273-s282. doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000402

13. Rao SB, Simpson TL. Influence of Vision on Ocular Comfort Ratings. Optom Vis Sci. Aug 2016;93(8):793-800. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000785

14. Maldonado-Codina C, Navascues Cornago M, Read ML, et al. The association of comfort and vision in soft toric contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. Aug 2021;44(4):101387. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.11.007

15. Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. Mar 2018;30(1):3-22. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009

16. CVI data on file, 2020. Rx coverage database n=101,973 aged 14 to 70 years. 

17. CVI data on file, 2023.