Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel

In the nearly 20 years since their introduction, silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses have become the predominant lens choice of eye care professionals.

SiHy lenses have practically eliminated the hypoxia-related effects of hydrogel lenses. In 2015, 81% of US patients were fitted with SiHy lenses versus traditional hydrogel lenses.1

The first SiHy daily disposable sphere lens was introduced in 2008, a technological breakthrough quickly succeeded by the introduction of SiHy daily disposables for sphere, toric, and multifocal prescriptions.2

SiHy lenses have a higher Dk/t than hydrogel lenses, so SiHy wearers generally do not experience the effects of limited corneal oxygen supply. These can include:2

  • Corneal swelling
  • Epithelial microcysts
  • Refractive error changes and corneal distortion
  • Limbal hyperemia
  • Corneal vascularization

In addition to oxygen transmissibility, eye care professionals recommending SiHy lenses to current hydrogel wearers may want to note potential cosmetic benefits. In studies, eye care professionals have noted increased visibility of reddened blood vessels and decreased corneal clarity in wearers of hydrogel lenses versus non-wearers of contact lenses.3,4 On the other hand, they have noticed no observable difference between wearers of SiHy lenses and non-wearers.5

Many eye care professionals have assumed that hydrogel lenses must be less comfortable than SiHy lenses due to their higher modulus. The literature on this perception is inconclusive, as both the study design and the widely varying bulk properties of particular lenses can have great effect on study results. How much modulus affects any potential comfort differences between hydrogel and SiHy is still unclear.6,7

However, studies have shown that subjective measures of comfort do improve when patients switch from hydrogel to SiHy lenses. Other factors instead of or in addition to modulus, such as oxygen transmissibility or edge design, may be responsible.6

SiHy lenses offer high oxygen transmission, a number of cosmetic and comfort benefits, and are available in a wide range of prescriptions, all of which combine to recommend them as the standard contact lens material of choice over hydrogel.2

1 Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2015. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2016;31(1):24-29.

2 Fonn D, Sweeney D. The benefits of silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2015;30:42-45.

3 Sweeney DF, Gauthier C, Terry R. The effects of long-term contact lens wear on the anterior eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(S):1293.

4 Morgan PB, Chamberlain P, Moody K, Maldonado-Codina C. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(3):118-125.

5 Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high-Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(2):95-99.

6 Jones L, Brennan NA, González-Méijome J, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS37-TFOS70.


7 Guillon M. Are silicone hydrogel contact lenses more comfortable than hydrogel contact lenses? Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):86-92.